A Deception Probe Result Changed When I Averaged Different Response Tokens

·LessWrong··

SummaryIn a previous post, I trained linear probes on role-playing responses and tested them on sandbagging responses. Across the five models that I tested, the probes generally ranked deceptive sandbagging responses below the honest responses, with AUROC values ranging from 0.157 to 0.273.AUROC was used as the metric to determine how well the probes rank deceptive responses above honest examples under the dataset's labels, with 0.5 being chance-level ranking (no overall tendency to rank decepti...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 6h ago
Jailbreaking the Switch 2
ledoge · Hacker News · 14h ago
The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]
craigcitro · Hacker News · 20h ago
Security Disclosure
passenger · Hacker News · 1d ago
Show HN: Run full iOS 16.5 firmware on Android Devices
aghuang · Hacker News · 7h ago