A genealogy of AI safety: how directions are born, and how they die (2005-2026)

·LessWrong··

What this is and how to read it Ask how AI safety reached this point, and most people give you a neat story. A small group of philosophers raised the first concerns about superintelligence. The arrival of large language models changed that, and many researchers turned to the alignment problem. The story is too tidy, and it leaves out the interesting part. Examine timelines, contributors, funding sources and publications, and it falls apart. New directions appear. A few merge into the mainstream,...

Read full article →

Related Articles

The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war
baud147258 · Hacker News · 15h ago
Postgres rewritten in Rust, now passing 100% of the Postgres regression tests
SweetSoftPillow · Hacker News · 22h ago
US seeks cheaper hunter-killer drones after Iran destroys $1B worth of Reapers
rbanffy · Hacker News · 15h ago
No leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2026
ChrisArchitect · Hacker News · 14h ago
GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper
adamkurkiewicz · Hacker News · 10h ago