A genealogy of AI safety: how directions are born, and how they die (2005-2026)

·LessWrong··

What this is and how to read it Ask how AI safety reached this point, and most people give you a neat story. A small group of philosophers raised the first concerns about superintelligence. The arrival of large language models changed that, and many researchers turned to the alignment problem. The story is too tidy, and it leaves out the interesting part. Examine timelines, contributors, funding sources and publications, and it falls apart. New directions appear. A few merge into the mainstream,...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Coconut oil jet fuel matches kerosene's efficiency in engine tests
mdp2021 · Hacker News · 16h ago
Slovakia finds Russian backdoor in traffic speed cameras
dredmorbius · Hacker News · 17h ago
GLM-5.3 (open-weight) beat Anthropic/OpenAI models – for 1/5 the cost
ed-is-ai · Hacker News · 15h ago
There's no reason for software to be slow anymore
Jach · Hacker News · 2d ago
How Complex Systems Fail (1998)
shortcrct · Hacker News · 16h ago