Automated alignment runs are hard to study!

·LessWrong··

TL;DR: This post presents three case studies of automated alignment research runs at Arcadia Impact. We use these case studies to emphasise the following takeaways:It is hard to parse auto-research runs! Each run produces a couple of hundred pull requests of jargon-dense agent output. When researchers look through these logs, we find that they often come away with biased/incorrect impressions.When told to raise the score on a task, the models will sometimes brazenly cheat. It seems difficult to ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Hackers Got Inside a Flock Camera
driverdan · Hacker News · 15h ago
Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photography
imwally · Hacker News · 1d ago
Xiaomi Mimo 2.6 live post-training dashboard
krackers · Hacker News · 8h ago
Training a 4B model to produce 81% faster query plans than Postgres
polyphilz · Hacker News · 9h ago
Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust
nonmaskable · Hacker News · 17h ago