Calibrating alignment evals

·LessWrong··

Currently, alignment evaluation works by constructing a situation, observing the model's behavior and scoring it. We put a lot of thought into designing these benchmarks, and tuning them for our requirement. We are now much better at probing models for dangerous behavior than we were two years ago. But when a safety benchmark returns a pass rate of 97%, can we answer questions of how often it would fail under slightly different conditions or what the smallest misalignment it can detect? I have i...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Top researchers leave USA for the Netherlands (in Dutch)
28304283409234 · Hacker News · 9h ago
GLM 5.2 and the coming AI margin collapse
martinald · Hacker News · 1d ago
OpenWrt One – Open Hardware Router
peter_d_sherman · Hacker News · 1d ago
Microsoft Can Track Users via a Windows Device ID
ifh-hn · Hacker News · 11h ago
Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
gasull · Hacker News · 6h ago