Can Frontier Models Autocomplete Safety Research?

·LessWrong··

We pose the following research question: how can we measure the "research taste" of language models in experiment planning? What parts of planning taste remain intrinsic to humans? TL;DR. A future where “tasteless autoresearch” improves capabilities but not safety is plausible and dangerous. We need rough tests of tasteful planning to see what is missing.We can start by masking part of a paper, sampling extensions from a language model, and comparing them against the masked experiments. This pro...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 5h ago
Jailbreaking the Switch 2
ledoge · Hacker News · 14h ago
The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]
craigcitro · Hacker News · 19h ago
Security Disclosure
passenger · Hacker News · 1d ago
The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable
velo_aprx · Hacker News · 1d ago