Can Frontier Models Autocomplete Safety Research?

·LessWrong··

We pose the following research question: how can we measure the "research taste" of language models in experiment planning? What parts of planning taste remain intrinsic to humans? TL;DR. A future where “tasteless autoresearch” improves capabilities but not safety is plausible and dangerous. We need rough tests of tasteful planning to see what is missing.We can start by masking part of a paper, sampling extensions from a language model, and comparing them against the masked experiments. This pro...

Read full article →

Related Articles

What xAI's Grok Build CLI Actually Sends to xAI
jhoho · Hacker News · 14h ago
Datacentres drive up big tech's carbon emissions to a third of those of France
YeGoblynQueenne · Hacker News · 4h ago
Old and new apps, via modern coding agents by Terry Tao
subset · Hacker News · 4h ago
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture [pdf]
scrlk · Hacker News · 1d ago
How to hide from killer drones
pseudolus · Hacker News · 20h ago