Can Frontier Models Autocomplete Safety Research?

·LessWrong··

We pose the following research question: how can we measure the "research taste" of language models in experiment planning? What parts of planning taste remain intrinsic to humans? TL;DR. A future where “tasteless autoresearch” improves capabilities but not safety is plausible and dangerous. We need rough tests of tasteful planning to see what is missing.We can start by masking part of a paper, sampling extensions from a language model, and comparing them against the masked experiments. This pro...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 15h ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 9h ago
Linux 7.3 improves performance when running out of vRAM
flaburgan · Hacker News · 1d ago
Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months
haunter · Hacker News · 1d ago
A 3D fruit fly on macOS desktop powered by the real FlyWire connectome
phoenix120 · Hacker News · 11h ago