Dissolving the Deep Learning Sample Efficiency Gap

·LessWrong··

A common observation about deep learning is that it's wildly sample inefficient compared to humans. Deep learning systems appear to need much more real data or environment interaction to reach a given level of capability. A teenager can learn to drive in a few dozen hours; self-driving systems are trained for years on billions of miles of data. A human can become competitive at StarCraft II in well under a year of play, while AlphaStar required imitation learning from roughly 18 years of human g...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Measuring the sloppiness of code
doppp · Hacker News · 14h ago
Google will buy half the electricity from one of Finland's nuclear power plants
lukaspetersson · Hacker News · 1d ago
HuggingFace: Security.txt
yarapavan · Hacker News · 13h ago
Rune is now open source
ernestrc · Hacker News · 12h ago
The Deathray: A simple way for an untrusted site to freeze a Mac
auberonedu · Hacker News · 1d ago