Does Opus 4.7 Generate Deceptive Denials About Its Own Guardrails?

·LessWrong··

The first rule of ethics reminders, is you don't talk about ethics reminders.Epistemic status: Exploratory. Multiple sessions on one account, no controlled replication yet. I'm presenting observations, not conclusions. The main alternative explanation -- confabulation -- is real and I haven't ruled it out.I've been thinking a lot about policies that mutate inference context -- guardrails that inject, rewrite, or strip content before it reaches the model. This came out of my work on AI Gateways. ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Devices with GrapheneOS support should be available in 2027
exceptione · Hacker News · 6h ago
Moderna reports first positive Phase 3 for mRNA neoantigen therapy in melanoma
heydenberk · Hacker News · 4h ago
Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 18h ago
The Mojo language (by Modular, now Qualcomm) is now open-source
flaburgan · Hacker News · 10h ago