Does Opus 4.7 Generate Deceptive Denials About Its Own Guardrails?

·LessWrong··

The first rule of ethics reminders, is you don't talk about ethics reminders.Epistemic status: Exploratory. Multiple sessions on one account, no controlled replication yet. I'm presenting observations, not conclusions. The main alternative explanation -- confabulation -- is real and I haven't ruled it out.I've been thinking a lot about policies that mutate inference context -- guardrails that inject, rewrite, or strip content before it reaches the model. This came out of my work on AI Gateways. ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

“Beyond the limit”: Satellites and mirrors in space pose threat to the night sky
Breadmaker · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solar rail could become common in Europe after successful trial in Switzerland
neilfrndes · Hacker News · 2h ago
GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance
maille · Hacker News · 19h ago
Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts
chatmasta · Hacker News · 1d ago
Show HN: KiCad in the Browser
ViktorEE · Hacker News · 5h ago