Does Opus 4.7 Generate Deceptive Denials About Its Own Guardrails?

·LessWrong··

The first rule of ethics reminders, is you don't talk about ethics reminders.Epistemic status: Exploratory. Multiple sessions on one account, no controlled replication yet. I'm presenting observations, not conclusions. The main alternative explanation -- confabulation -- is real and I haven't ruled it out.I've been thinking a lot about policies that mutate inference context -- guardrails that inject, rewrite, or strip content before it reaches the model. This came out of my work on AI Gateways. ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
tedsanders · Hacker News · 20h ago
GitHub confirms breach of 3,800 repos via malicious VSCode extension
Timofeibu · Hacker News · 1d ago
Show HN: Rmux – A programmable terminal multiplexer with a Playwright-style SDK
shideneyu · Hacker News · 6h ago
Incident Report: May 19, 2026 – GCP Account Suspension
0xedb · Hacker News · 1d ago
Not alive, but not dead: disembodied human brains used for drug testing
Timofeibu · Hacker News · 19h ago