Empowerment, corrigibility, etc. are simple abstractions (of a messed-up ontology)

·LessWrong··

1.1 Tl;drAlignment is often conceptualized as AIs helping humans achieve their goals: AIs that increase people’s agency and empowerment; AIs that are helpful, corrigible, and/or obedient; AIs that avoid manipulating people. But that last one—manipulation—points to a challenge for all these desiderata: a human’s goals are themselves under-determined and manipulable, and it’s awfully hard to pin down a principled distinction between changing people’s goals in a good way (“providing counsel”, “prov...

Read full article →

Related Articles

An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
tedsanders · Hacker News · 20h ago
GitHub confirms breach of 3,800 repos via malicious VSCode extension
Timofeibu · Hacker News · 1d ago
Show HN: Rmux – A programmable terminal multiplexer with a Playwright-style SDK
shideneyu · Hacker News · 6h ago
Incident Report: May 19, 2026 – GCP Account Suspension
0xedb · Hacker News · 1d ago
Not alive, but not dead: disembodied human brains used for drug testing
Timofeibu · Hacker News · 19h ago