Empowerment, corrigibility, etc. are simple abstractions (of a messed-up ontology)

·LessWrong··

1.1 Tl;drAlignment is often conceptualized as AIs helping humans achieve their goals: AIs that increase people’s agency and empowerment; AIs that are helpful, corrigible, and/or obedient; AIs that avoid manipulating people. But that last one—manipulation—points to a challenge for all these desiderata: a human’s goals are themselves under-determined and manipulable, and it’s awfully hard to pin down a principled distinction between changing people’s goals in a good way (“providing counsel”, “prov...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'
sbulaev · Hacker News · 9h ago
Kolibri: A Sovereign Open-Weight Model
bastitx · Hacker News · 21h ago
Pi 1.0
sergiotapia · Hacker News · 2d ago
Updates to Full Disk Access in macOS
notfirstpost · Hacker News · 1d ago
FTL: A new operating system for clouds
romac · Hacker News · 16h ago