Evidence for feature-specific error correction in LLMs
LLMs are commonly assumed to use superposition to represent more features than they have dimensions. The evidence for this is mostly indirect — chiefly the success of SAEs at extracting interpretable directions. A stronger claim is that models also compute in superposition, and for that we have only theoretical evidence.Hänni et al. 2024 showed that computing in superposition requires error correction: because features are embedded non-orthogonally, each active feature produces a small interfere...
Read full article →