Frank Ramsey on Induction: Why Validity Is the Wrong Standard

·LessWrong··

Frank Ramsey's treatment of induction starts from a general account of inference. He argues that premises and conclusion alone do not fully specify an inference. It also needs the rule by which the conclusion is drawn. This holds for deductive and inductive arguments alike, though the rule differs in kind between them. Deductive rules preserve truth. Inductive rules do not. Inductive rules are judged instead by how reliably they extend belief from observed cases to unobserved ones. This three-pa...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Historical memory prices 1960-2026
vga1 · Hacker News · 19h ago
TOP500 at ISC’26: We have a New Number 1 Supercomputer
rbanffy · Hacker News · 18h ago
DSpark: Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference [pdf]
aurenvale · Hacker News · 2d ago
Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities
htrp · Hacker News · 4d ago
Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?
DR_MING · Hacker News · 4h ago