How to define P(doom) and why it matters

·LessWrong··

The usefulness of p(doom) is controversial, but also it is tricky to even define since the usual ways we think about credence don't work with apocalyptic events. Not too tricky, but tricky enough I figured it would be worth writing up a note on it! In the process I also hope to show why it is useful, and why it is definitely not "an astrological sign" if used correctly. AI disclosure: No AI, just my meat brain this time! (Not counting spell check or search engines.) How we usually think about cr...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Hackers Got Inside a Flock Camera
driverdan · Hacker News · 15h ago
Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photography
imwally · Hacker News · 1d ago
Xiaomi Mimo 2.6 live post-training dashboard
krackers · Hacker News · 8h ago
Training a 4B model to produce 81% faster query plans than Postgres
polyphilz · Hacker News · 9h ago
Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust
nonmaskable · Hacker News · 17h ago