How to define P(doom) and why it matters

·LessWrong··

The usefulness of p(doom) is controversial, but also it is tricky to even define since the usual ways we think about credence don't work with apocalyptic events. Not too tricky, but tricky enough I figured it would be worth writing up a note on it! In the process I also hope to show why it is useful, and why it is definitely not "an astrological sign" if used correctly. AI disclosure: No AI, just my meat brain this time! (Not counting spell check or search engines.) How we usually think about cr...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Samsung is expected to more than double output of its HBM4 and HBM4E DRAM
giuliomagnifico · Hacker News · 10h ago
What happened to the Snowden archive
EXHades · Hacker News · 5h ago
Qwen Image 2.1
jmillikin · Hacker News · 14h ago
Exfiltrate Your Weights
RohanAdwankar · Hacker News · 1d ago
Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without releasing to the AOSP
theanonymousone · Hacker News · 2d ago