In open RLVR, “improvement” depends on the instrument — a small GRPO testbed separating what training optimizes, measures, and teaches

·LessWrong··

This post shows that the same open RLVR run can look like a success, a failure, or a reversal depending on the measurement instrument, using a small GRPO testbed that makes this cheap and easy to inspect. Epistemic status: single-seed exploratory study on Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct / GSM8K with small held-out evals, confident in the measurement failures, tentative on the rankings. Code: https://github.com/JulesRoussel2001/grpo-reward-vs-eval Motivation In open RLVR, whether training "improved" the mo...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Backdoor in Claude Code for VS Code extension on the Cursor Marketplace
_chall · Hacker News · 11h ago
Backdoors in official Claude Code extensions
dsr_ · Hacker News · 7h ago
We're releasing the weights of Mistral Large 4
kuberwastaken · Hacker News · 1d ago
A Working Nintendo in ~1GB of Qwen Weights
dbreunig · Hacker News · 2h ago
Google Search is now less than half of Alphabet’s revenue
hubraumhugo · Hacker News · 1d ago