LLMs Are Not (Consistently) Bayesian: Quantifying Internal (In)consistencies of LLMs’ Probabilistic Beliefs

Apple ML Research··

Modern AI systems are being deployed in complex domains such as medicine, science, and law, where there is often not a single correct answer given the observed evidence. Such systems must be able to represent and update uncertain beliefs about the world as new evidence arrives to make rational decisions. We introduce the novel technique of studying LLMs as information processing rules and utilize the information processing gap—the deviation from Bayes updates—to study the internal (in)consistenc...

Read full article →

Related Articles

OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
donsupreme · Hacker News · 3mo ago
Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token prediction drafters
amrrs · Hacker News · 3mo ago
A couple million lines of Haskell: Production engineering at Mercury
unignorant · Hacker News · 3mo ago
Using “underdrawings” for accurate text and numbers
samcollins · Hacker News · 3mo ago
ProgramBench: Can language models rebuild programs from scratch?
jonbaer · Hacker News · 3mo ago