Monitor Evasion Depends on What RL Finds and What Monitors Miss

·LessWrong··

Training against a monitor does not necessarily make a model more honest. Baker et al. (2025) showed that penalizing suspicious chain-of-thought can make models hide reward hacking rather than stop it. Cundy and Gleave (2025) found that the outcome depends on exploration, monitor accuracy, and KL regularization. More recently, The Obfuscation Atlas (2026) distinguished two ways models evade monitoring: changing their internal representations (obfuscated activations) and producing deceptive respo...

Read full article →

Related Articles

TCP Use-After-Free: CVE-2026-98432 / CVSS 9.8
oger · Hacker News · 19h ago
The AI cost of JavaScript frameworks
luu · Hacker News · 8h ago
GPT-5.6 Sol can beat Factorio on peaceful mode
ryanmadden · Hacker News · 19h ago
Brazilian Court Sanctions Lawyers for Prompt Injection in Court Filing
doodlesdev · Hacker News · 12h ago
Jepsen: ParticleDB 1.1.4
aphyr · Hacker News · 1d ago