Overreaching causal language in the social sciences

·Marginal Revolution··

Across the social sciences, many studies use cross-sectional designs that reveal associations but are generally unable to support direct causal claims, yet authors of such articles may make or imply causal claims anyway. Here, to examine the prevalence of such ‘overreaching’ causal language, we analysed 194,631 cross-sectional articles using large language models. Over the period 1980–2024, an average of 46% of articles contained causal language in their titles or abstracts, where the annual rat...

Read full article →

Related Articles

UK Fuel Price Intelligence – Market analytics from reporting stations
theazureguy · Hacker News · 3mo ago
Microsoft filings suggest "around 70%" of its AI revenue is on OpenAI
speckx · Hacker News · 19d ago
The iPhone explains 33–52% of fertility decline among women aged 15–44
delichon · Hacker News · 2mo ago
Breaking Ground: Can Refund Bonuses Solve the Holdout Problem?
Alex Tabarrok · Marginal Revolution · 4d ago
using tick data for spot-vol correlations
Kris Abdelmessih · Moontower · 5d ago