Patching reward hacks won’t fix reward hacking

·LessWrong··

In the spirit of More people should write basic AI safety explainers, here's a basic argument that focusing on patching reward hacking is misguided and will fail. It's an attempt to distill my understanding of what we're seeing right now + a variety of relevant sources.[1] Argument is as follows:Reward hacking is a big problem, causing models to cheat and take unintended actions.This can generalise broadly, leading to other misbehaviour such as faking alignment and sabotaging safety research.We ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 1d ago
Evolving Threat: http2shell is an RCE in Node, Python, and more
cowlevel · Hacker News · 11h ago
UUIDv7: Timestamps aren’t time-ordered and other oddities
ibobev · Hacker News · 18h ago
The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable
velo_aprx · Hacker News · 3d ago
DeepInfer: High-performance inference framework for DeepSeek models
ggcr · Hacker News · 4d ago