Redux: (∃ Stochastic Natural Latent) Implies (∃ Deterministic Natural Latent)

·LessWrong··

Once upon a time, John Wentworth and I thought we had a proof of a very useful looking theorem. We did not have that proof. An important intermediate step was shown[1] to be invalid and the whole thing crumbled and disappeared, never to see the light of day again...[2]Until now! I'd love to say that we came up with an ingenious fix to the old erroneous proof, but unfortunately it turned out to be a really infuriatingly hard nut to crack. Instead I spent the last ~month experimenting with various...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows
riordan · Hacker News · 21h ago
Mistral Patent for “Code implemented tool calls”
theanonymousone · Hacker News · 18h ago
Kinney Drugs pulls back AI phone assistant after hundreds of customer complaints
kotaKat · Hacker News · 16h ago
Show HN: Needle2: 14MB agentic LLM for phones, wearables, smart home and robots
HenryNdubuaku · Hacker News · 14h ago
Study links GLP-1 drugs to bigger jump in women's employment than a degree
metadat · Hacker News · 15h ago