AI legibility, physical archives, and the future of research

·Res Obscura··

Pradyumna Prasad, a computer science PhD student at the National University of Singapore, recently made what I thought was a very perceptive observation about where AI and knowledge work is headed:If your job is legible enough that people can make a dataset clearly pointing out what is right and what is wrong, you are at the highest risk for an AI model being ‘superhuman’ at your job. It is even more risky if it is possible to articulate your thought process in a way that is verifiable.Looking a...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Welfare Biology and AI: The Psychopath, the Nematode, and the Arahant
Dawn Drescher · EA Forum · 4d ago
Immigration changes are driving foreign researchers to leave the U.S. — or not come to begin with 
Andrew Joseph · STAT News · 4d ago
Models Recall What They Violate: Constraint Adherence in Multi-Turn LLM Ideation
Garvin Kruthof · ArXiv cs.AI · 4d ago
Looking for papers on general formalizations of "agency"
lovagrus · LessWrong · 5d ago
SFF’s HSEE grant round; human intelligence amplification projects I’d like to see by TsviBT
TsviBT · Nuno Sempere · 8d ago