Sanity Checks for Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders

·LessWrong··

This post will probably not be very informative to readers who don't know what an SAE (Sparse Autoencoder) is.An interpretability researcher once told me, "SAEs can never fail, they can only be failed." But recently, SAEs have been suffering failure after failure, and as a result, the field has grown increasingly pessimistic about SAE work. Korznikov et al.'s Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines? purports to be an example of such failures. However, I have some dis...

Read full article →

Related Articles

GPT-5.6 Sol can beat Factorio on peaceful mode
ryanmadden · Hacker News · 3h ago
UK Green party drops longstanding opposition to nuclear power
mpweiher · Hacker News · 4h ago
TCP Use-After-Free: CVE-2026-98432 / CVSS 9.8
oger · Hacker News · 3h ago
Malware uses LLMs to rank victims by how much they're worth
khalidkhair · Hacker News · 8h ago
Backdoor in Claude Code for VS Code extension on the Cursor Marketplace
_chall · Hacker News · 1d ago