Some observations about NLA explanations

·LessWrong··

I used the Gemma 3 12B activation verbalizer (maps activations to English) and reconstructor (maps English to activations) described in the Natural Language Autoencoders (NLA) paper to generate a bunch of explanations for 20k random tokens from a pretraining dataset (Common Pile derivative) and another 20k random tokens from a chat dataset. I also reconstructed all of the activations from the verbalizations so that I could see what kinds of tokens and explanations have high reconstruction error....

Read full article →

Related Articles

Pi 1.0
sergiotapia · Hacker News · 1d ago
Updates to Full Disk Access in macOS
notfirstpost · Hacker News · 23h ago
Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
hn_acker · Hacker News · 1d ago
The Forgetful CPU (Linux on M4)
signa11 · Hacker News · 1d ago
The Legend of von Neumann (1973) [pdf]
suopspaces · Hacker News · 1d ago