Some observations about NLA explanations

·LessWrong··

I used the Gemma 3 12B activation verbalizer (maps activations to English) and reconstructor (maps English to activations) described in the Natural Language Autoencoders (NLA) paper to generate a bunch of explanations for 20k random tokens from a pretraining dataset (Common Pile derivative) and another 20k random tokens from a chat dataset. I also reconstructed all of the activations from the verbalizations so that I could see what kinds of tokens and explanations have high reconstruction error....

Read full article →

Related Articles

Devices with GrapheneOS support should be available in 2027
exceptione · Hacker News · 6h ago
Moderna reports first positive Phase 3 for mRNA neoantigen therapy in melanoma
heydenberk · Hacker News · 4h ago
Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 18h ago
The Mojo language (by Modular, now Qualcomm) is now open-source
flaburgan · Hacker News · 10h ago