Some observations about NLA explanations

·LessWrong··

I used the Gemma 3 12B activation verbalizer (maps activations to English) and reconstructor (maps English to activations) described in the Natural Language Autoencoders (NLA) paper to generate a bunch of explanations for 20k random tokens from a pretraining dataset (Common Pile derivative) and another 20k random tokens from a chat dataset. I also reconstructed all of the activations from the verbalizations so that I could see what kinds of tokens and explanations have high reconstruction error....

Read full article →

Related Articles

“Beyond the limit”: Satellites and mirrors in space pose threat to the night sky
Breadmaker · Hacker News · 1d ago
GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance
maille · Hacker News · 19h ago
Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts
chatmasta · Hacker News · 1d ago
EV Batteries Are Defying Expectations After Miles
apparent · Hacker News · 10h ago
Show HN: KiCad in the Browser
ViktorEE · Hacker News · 5h ago