The Pragmatic Interpretability Trap

·LessWrong··

TLDR: Pragmatic interp sounds great in the sense that you get to keep interp tools while actually moving safety metrics, but looking a bit closer it's kinda a trap. You pay interp's overhead but get judged against black-box baselines that don't, so the work that survives is whatever cleared that bar, not whatever produced understanding. The two scoreboards (understanding vs intervention) don't actually run side by side; the metric one eats the other, and stuff like NLAs end up failing both, you ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Devices with GrapheneOS support should be available in 2027
exceptione · Hacker News · 6h ago
Moderna reports first positive Phase 3 for mRNA neoantigen therapy in melanoma
heydenberk · Hacker News · 4h ago
Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 18h ago
The Mojo language (by Modular, now Qualcomm) is now open-source
flaburgan · Hacker News · 10h ago