The safe-to-dangerous shift is a fundamental problem for eval realism; but also for measuring awareness

·LessWrong··

1) The safe-to-dangerous shift is a fundamental problem for eval realismSuppose we have a capable and potentially scheming model, and before we deploy it, we want some evidence that it won’t do anything catastrophically dangerous once we deploy it. A common approach is to use black-box alignment evaluations. However, alignment evaluations are only reassuring to the extent that the model can't reliably[1] distinguish the deployment distribution from the evaluation distribution, as it is otherwise...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Devices with GrapheneOS support should be available in 2027
exceptione · Hacker News · 6h ago
Moderna reports first positive Phase 3 for mRNA neoantigen therapy in melanoma
heydenberk · Hacker News · 4h ago
Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 18h ago
The Mojo language (by Modular, now Qualcomm) is now open-source
flaburgan · Hacker News · 10h ago