The safe-to-dangerous shift is a fundamental problem for eval realism; but also for measuring awareness

·LessWrong··

1) The safe-to-dangerous shift is a fundamental problem for eval realismSuppose we have a capable and potentially scheming model, and before we deploy it, we want some evidence that it won’t do anything catastrophically dangerous once we deploy it. A common approach is to use black-box alignment evaluations. However, alignment evaluations are only reassuring to the extent that the model can't reliably[1] distinguish the deployment distribution from the evaluation distribution, as it is otherwise...

Read full article →

Related Articles

“Beyond the limit”: Satellites and mirrors in space pose threat to the night sky
Breadmaker · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solar rail could become common in Europe after successful trial in Switzerland
neilfrndes · Hacker News · 2h ago
GPT-5.5 Codex reasoning-token clustering may be leading to degraded performance
maille · Hacker News · 19h ago
Potential session/cache leakage between workspace instances or consumer accounts
chatmasta · Hacker News · 1d ago
Show HN: KiCad in the Browser
ViktorEE · Hacker News · 5h ago