Towards embedded evaluations for scheming propensities

·LessWrong··

TL;DR: A safety case for scheming must be able to substantiate these four key claims: scheming was not incentivized during training, strong evaluations and red teaming suggest that the model does not have a propensity to scheme, scheming was never attempted during internal deployment, and scheming reasoning would be detected (e.g., via CoT monitoring). All four of these claims should be addressed by embedded evaluators with persistent, deep access.IntroductionA scheming AI is one that covertly a...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 5h ago
Jailbreaking the Switch 2
ledoge · Hacker News · 13h ago
The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]
craigcitro · Hacker News · 19h ago
Security Disclosure
passenger · Hacker News · 1d ago
The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable
velo_aprx · Hacker News · 1d ago