Training Language Models for Controlled Stochasticity

·LessWrong··

Pseudo-random generation solved the problem of sampling from mathematical distributions on computers. Faced with a similar need in natural language, it feels natural to simply ask an LLM: "Name a random city" but this leads to the disappointing discovery that language models are heavily biased and suffer from mode collapse. For instance, when Qwen3 is asked to pick a random weekday, it chooses Wednesday about 80% of the time. Gemma-3, when naming cities, gives 75% of its answers as just four cit...

Read full article →

Related Articles

US bans differential privacy in Census data
nl · Hacker News · 2h ago
Arch Linux Now Believes Malware Incident Under Control: More Than 1,500 Packages
qwertox · Hacker News · 4h ago
Twenty One Zero-Days in FFmpeg
redbell · Hacker News · 18h ago
CRISPR tech selectively shreds cancer cells, including "undruggable" cancers
gmays · Hacker News · 1d ago
Kimi K2.7-Code: open-source coding model with better token efficiency
nekofneko · Hacker News · 1d ago