Training On Interpretability Probes Is Bad In Proportion To How Contingent The Features They Rely On Are

·LessWrong··

People spend a lot of words playing tug of war over whether or not it's reasonable to train against interpretability methods. The anti case goes something like "training based on interpreted features trains against Interpretability itself more than it trains against whatever features you're detecting". There are cases where we should expect this to be true and cases where we should expect this to be not true. It basically comes down to how much the model can encrypt/obfuscate the relevant featur...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Grok Build is open source
skp1995 · Hacker News · 21h ago
How Our Rust-to-Zig Rewrite Is Going
jorangreef · Hacker News · 5h ago
Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration (2023)
bilsbie · Hacker News · 1d ago
If you want to create a button from scratch, you must first create the universe
treve · Hacker News · 13h ago
Running Gemma 4 26B at 5 tokens/sec on a 13-year-old Xeon with no GPU
neomindryan · Hacker News · 1d ago