Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability

Apple ML Research··

Safety policies define what constitutes safe and unsafe AI outputs, guiding data annotation and model development. However, annotation disagreement is pervasive and can stem from multiple sources such as operational failures (annotators misunderstand or misexecute the task), policy ambiguity (policy wording leaves room for interpretation), or value pluralism (different annotators hold different perspectives on safety). Distinguishing these sources matters. For example, operational failures call ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
donsupreme · Hacker News · 5mo ago
Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token prediction drafters
amrrs · Hacker News · 5mo ago
A couple million lines of Haskell: Production engineering at Mercury
unignorant · Hacker News · 5mo ago
Using “underdrawings” for accurate text and numbers
samcollins · Hacker News · 5mo ago
Harvard particle physicist Matthew Schwartz drops 36 papers authored with Claude
xqcgrek2 · Hacker News · 2d ago