We need good evals for activation faithfulness

·LessWrong··

Tl;dr: There should be a clear, well-designed eval on activation faithfulness: whether the model activations a monitor reads remain a trustworthy surface when the model suspects/knows it is being monitored. We provide an appendix with preliminary results towards such an eval in case people want to build off of it, but we think way more work needs to be done here.—There is currently a lot of discussion around the precarious state of CoT monitorability. To our knowledge, CoT monitorability is thre...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Measuring the sloppiness of code
doppp · Hacker News · 14h ago
Google will buy half the electricity from one of Finland's nuclear power plants
lukaspetersson · Hacker News · 1d ago
HuggingFace: Security.txt
yarapavan · Hacker News · 13h ago
Rune is now open source
ernestrc · Hacker News · 12h ago
The Deathray: A simple way for an untrusted site to freeze a Mac
auberonedu · Hacker News · 1d ago