Whack-a-mole with a broken hammer: does a model internally track its automaton state?

·LessWrong··

TL;DR: We check whether a small model (Qwen2.5-1.5B) internally tracks its state in a simple DFA (modelled after a login protocol), given a series of events. This state is never written in the transcript the model sees, but it can be deduced from the events written down. A linear probe reads the correct state most of the time (88.6%). It scores 80.8% in experiments where the order is the only determinant of the final state (versus a maximum of 60.4% for any order-blind method), so the model foll...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Field measurements of neighborhood-scale air temperature impacts of data centers
cwwc · Hacker News · 8h ago
Linux 7.3 improves performance when running out of vRAM
flaburgan · Hacker News · 18h ago
Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months
haunter · Hacker News · 1d ago
Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries
zX41ZdbW · Hacker News · 2h ago
Meta Files Patent for Facial Recognition, Automatic Recording of People
DeepLogin · Hacker News · 13h ago