When are safe Pareto improvements individually rational?

·LessWrong··

(Soft prerequisites: A high-level model of AI bargaining and Taboo “equilibrium”: Less confused frames for research on AI bargaining.) Section II.1 of CLR’s safe Pareto improvements (SPI) agenda briefly reviews the challenges for making SPIs individually rational. Here, I’ll flesh out these challenges, taking renegotiation SPIs as a running example. The ideas here overlap a lot with DiGiovanni et al. (2024) and its distillation. But this post will hopefully be more accessible, and will consider ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 5h ago
Jailbreaking the Switch 2
ledoge · Hacker News · 13h ago
The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]
craigcitro · Hacker News · 19h ago
Security Disclosure
passenger · Hacker News · 1d ago
The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable
velo_aprx · Hacker News · 1d ago