Where Did D Go? A Gap Between ARC's Motivation and Its Formalism

·LessWrong··

TL;DR: ARC's post does excellent work motivating a p(doom) estimator equal or better than random sampling; however, they evaluate p(doom) over a naive distribution of inputs, leaving them open to test-deploy asymmetry attacks. Trojan theory and cybersecurity practice suggest a lens and compare mitigation options.Context: I really admire ARC's focus here: If there will always be more deployment samples than testing samples, successful testing must compete with sampling in order to prevent deploye...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans
rakannimer · Hacker News · 5h ago
Jailbreaking the Switch 2
ledoge · Hacker News · 14h ago
The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]
craigcitro · Hacker News · 19h ago
Security Disclosure
passenger · Hacker News · 1d ago
The 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is no longer viable
velo_aprx · Hacker News · 1d ago