Where Did D Go? A Gap Between ARC's Motivation and Its Formalism

·LessWrong··

TL;DR: ARC's post does excellent work motivating a p(doom) estimator equal or better than random sampling; however, they evaluate p(doom) over a naive distribution of inputs, leaving them open to test-deploy asymmetry attacks. Trojan theory and cybersecurity practice suggest a lens and compare mitigation options.Context: I really admire ARC's focus here: If there will always be more deployment samples than testing samples, successful testing must compete with sampling in order to prevent deploye...

Read full article →

Related Articles

An ongoing 3D-printer AGPL violation
Velocifyer · Hacker News · 4h ago
Z.ai confirms Ox Alpha is a new GLM-series model and will release its weights
garo-pro · Hacker News · 11h ago
Xiaomi: New CPU matches Apple cores single threaded, much faster multithreaded
tosh · Hacker News · 2d ago
Study Reveals UnitedHealth's Profit Margins Four Times What It Claimed [pdf]
CGMthrowaway · Hacker News · 3h ago
FDA authorizes first wearable device that monitors ketone and blood sugar levels
sunnynagra · Hacker News · 1d ago