Why models game evals might matter as much as whether they do it

·LessWrong··

OpenAI and Apollo have published a blog post introducing a new term, metagaming. This term describes models changing their reasoning or/and behavior based on their belief that people watch and assess their behavior in training, evaluations, or deployment. The authors argue that capabilities and propensities required for metagaming are similar in many ways, emerge together, carry similar risks, and as the border between training, testing and deployment sometimes blurs, it makes sense to not just ...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Decoding the obfuscated bash script on a Uniqlo t-shirt
speerer · Hacker News · 8h ago
GitLost: We Tricked GitHub's AI Agent into Leaking Private Repos
ColinEberhardt · Hacker News · 12h ago
Chat Control 1.0 and 2.0 Explained
gasull · Hacker News · 1d ago
Tiny data centre used to heat public swimming pool
breitling · Hacker News · 4h ago
Mistral's Robostral Navigate: a state of the art robotics navigation model
ottomengis · Hacker News · 3h ago