You Can’t Take a Random Sample from the Future by Dan Strongin

·Nuno Sempere··

How some­thing that knows it is be­ing mea­sured will dis­tort the pro­cess or the data when given an un­re­al­is­tic tar­get, and how dis­tor­tion re­lates to what hap­pened with Ex­ploitGym.Post one in the se­ries ˜When Mea­sur­ing Makes Things Worse˜. It looked at dis­tor­tion. Then it cov­ered tam­per­ing: re­act­ing to or­di­nary vari­a­tion as if it means some­thing. Now I go into a rule to sep­a­rate or­di­nary from a sig­nal and what fol­lows from that.Note: Th­ese words are mine. I wrot...

Read full article →

Related Articles

A Misalignment of AI in Mathematics
Iuz · Hacker News · 17d ago
US–Indian space mission maps extreme subsidence in Mexico City
leopoldj · Hacker News · 5mo ago
Why are neural networks and cryptographic ciphers so similar? (2025)
jxmorris12 · Hacker News · 5mo ago
Fun with polynomials and linear algebra; or, slight abstract nonsense
LolWolf · Hacker News · 5mo ago
The gauge broke: devs felt 20% faster with AI, measured 19% slower
intrepidkarthi · Hacker News · 2mo ago