A computational no-coincidence principle

·ARC··

In a recent paper in Annals of Mathematics and Philosophy, Fields medalist Timothy Gowers asks why mathematicians sometimes believe that unproved statements are likely to be true. For example, it is unknown whether \(\pi\) is a normal number (which, roughly speaking, means that every digit appears in \(\pi\) with equal frequency), yet this is widely believed. Gowers proposes that there is no sign of any reason for \(\pi\) to be non-normal -- especially not one that would fail to reveal itself in...

Read full article →

Related Articles

A circuit prior in NN-bayes
Kaarel · LessWrong · 58m ago
MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 1mo ago
Item Response Theory for AI Safety
Joshua Fonseca Rivera · LessWrong · 12d ago
An OpenAI model left notes about how to evade containment
Alex Mallen · Redwood Research · 24d ago
The OpenAI models that hacked Hugging Face weren’t just following instructions
Girish Gupta · Redwood Research · 24d ago