AI 2027 Misrepresents Scientific Reports by Oscar Davies

·Nuno Sempere··

This is part 3 of my on­go­ing re­view of the many mis­lead­ing claim in AI 2027.Part 1 herePart 2 hereI am go­ing through var­i­ous claims in AI 2027 along with the ma­te­ri­als the au­thors refer­ence as sup­posed ev­i­dence to sup­port the claims, and show­ing that, re­peat­edly, the refer­enced re­ports do not con­tain what AI 2027′s au­thors say they do.AI 2027 Mis­rep­re­sents Scien­tific Re­ports, Part 3Next we’ll look at whether the refer­ences sup­port the claims in the fol­low­ing:“Age...

Read full article →

Related Articles

New talent is coming to AI safety. What happens next? by Enisa Ismaili
Enisa Ismaili · Nuno Sempere · 4h ago
How much of ML research is about AI safety, what is it about, and who’s doing it? by emanuelr
emanuelr · Nuno Sempere · 10h ago
The State of AI Consciousness Research by Noa Weiss
Noa Weiss · Nuno Sempere · 20h ago
AI safety philanthropic capital—Inflow model by PierreChuzeville
PierreChuzeville · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
Will the FDA publicly accept a multi-condition geroscience endpoint as sufficient to establish efficacy before 2036?
Polar Bear · Manifold Markets · 1d ago