are we locked into P(doom)? by keivn

·Nuno Sempere··

start­ing with the conclusionear­lier this year I was a part of the lat­est co­hort at AI safety camp (AISC). the pro­ject I had joined — In­ves­ti­gat­ing as­sump­tions of the doom de­bate — had a goal to build a prob­a­bil­is­tic as­sump­tion tree for AI doom ar­gu­ments.sev­eral mem­bers made ver­sions of the tree, but the one that we col­lec­tively worked on, started from a root node “Danger­ous AI oc­curs.” one branch — “model ca­pac­ity”broke down into a dozen subn­odes, from in­fer­ence a...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Will an AI do Magic before EOY 2027? [See description]
calour · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
How many Anthropic/OpenAI employees will resign in September 2026 due to ethical concerns?
Caleb Biddulph · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
Assessing the impact of safety work needs equilibrium analysis (now more than ever) by Simon Skade
Simon Skade · Nuno Sempere · 2d ago
Strategy Advice from AI Forecasting Bot Makers (Spring 2026) by Benjamin Wilson 🔸
Benjamin Wilson 🔸 · Nuno Sempere · 2d ago
What AI Forecasting Strategy Works Best? (Spring 2026 Survey Analysis) by Benjamin Wilson 🔸
Benjamin Wilson 🔸 · Nuno Sempere · 2d ago