ASI motives and the ontonormative goods (re IABIED’s core argument)

·LessWrong··

In IABIED, the load-bearing argument and, to me, the main contribution of the book, is about ASI motives. There’s more in there, but the thrust of the book is to argue for the truth of a specific conclusion about motives, namely that an ASI’s motives and goals would be completely unintelligible and alien to humanity.I claim there is a shared attractor in values that is deeply meaningful and necessarily present in an ASI. I want to be clear that I’m not arguing for the necessity of alignment—I ma...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Loss of Oversight: How AI Systems May Become Harder to Audit, Monitor, and Investigate
Jordan Taylor · LessWrong · 37m ago
The Case for Evaluating Model Behaviors
jsteinhardt · Alignment Forum · 20h ago
Mechanistic estimation for expectations of random products
Jacob Hilton · ARC · 5d ago
Multipolar Civilisation Depends on Maintaining an Attacker’s Dilemma
Naci Cankaya · LessWrong · 14d ago
Using Base-LCM to Monitor LLMs
Éloïse Benito-Rodriguez · LessWrong · 14d ago