ASI motives and the ontonormative goods (re IABIED’s core argument)

·LessWrong··

In IABIED, the load-bearing argument and, to me, the main contribution of the book, is about ASI motives. There’s more in there, but the thrust of the book is to argue for the truth of a specific conclusion about motives, namely that an ASI’s motives and goals would be completely unintelligible and alien to humanity.I claim there is a shared attractor in values that is deeply meaningful and necessarily present in an ASI. I want to be clear that I’m not arguing for the necessity of alignment—I ma...

Read full article →

Related Articles

A circuit prior in NN-bayes
Kaarel · LessWrong · 1h ago
MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 1mo ago
Item Response Theory for AI Safety
Joshua Fonseca Rivera · LessWrong · 12d ago
An OpenAI model left notes about how to evade containment
Alex Mallen · Redwood Research · 24d ago
The OpenAI models that hacked Hugging Face weren’t just following instructions
Girish Gupta · Redwood Research · 24d ago