Fail safe(r) at alignment by channeling reward-hacking into a "spillway" motivation

·Redwood Research··

It’s plausible that flawed RL processes will select for misaligned AI motivations.1 Some misaligned motivations are much more dangerous than others. So, developers should plausibly aim to control which kind of misaligned motivations emerge in this case. In particular, we tentatively propose that developers should try to make the most likely generalization of reward hacking a bespoke bundle of benign reward-seeking traits, called a spillway motivation. We call this process spillway design.We thin...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Loss of Oversight: How AI Systems May Become Harder to Audit, Monitor, and Investigate
Jordan Taylor · LessWrong · 37m ago
The Case for Evaluating Model Behaviors
jsteinhardt · Alignment Forum · 20h ago
Mechanistic estimation for expectations of random products
Jacob Hilton · ARC · 5d ago
Multipolar Civilisation Depends on Maintaining an Attacker’s Dilemma
Naci Cankaya · LessWrong · 14d ago
Using Base-LCM to Monitor LLMs
Éloïse Benito-Rodriguez · LessWrong · 14d ago