Fail safe(r) at alignment by channeling reward-hacking into a "spillway" motivation

·Redwood Research··

It’s plausible that flawed RL processes will select for misaligned AI motivations.1 Some misaligned motivations are much more dangerous than others. So, developers should plausibly aim to control which kind of misaligned motivations emerge in this case. In particular, we tentatively propose that developers should try to make the most likely generalization of reward hacking a bespoke bundle of benign reward-seeking traits, called a spillway motivation. We call this process spillway design.We thin...

Read full article →

Related Articles

MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 2mo ago
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Gender Discrimination Transformed Rather Than
sbulaev · Hacker News · 14d ago
Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
Alex Mallen · Alignment Forum · 8d ago
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
Lukas Finnveden · Redwood Research · 10d ago
Can parts of the HuggingFace incident be simulated?
Benedikt Droste · LessWrong · 16d ago