General capability—and capabilities generally—have no good y-axis by Gregory Lewis🔸

·Nuno Sempere··

BLUF:To de­ter­mine whether AI is ‘im­prov­ing ex­po­nen­tially’, ‘hit­ting the wall’, or any other claim which in­volves a quan­tity or mag­ni­tude (e.g. ‘This model was a big leap/​small in­cre­ment’). We need a good y-axis: an in­ter­val scale of AI ca­pa­bil­ity which means +1 unit always rep­re­sents the same de­gree of ‘how much bet­ter’, in the same way +1 de­gree Cel­sius is always the same amount of ‘how much hot­ter’.Yet there is no good y-axis for AI ca­pa­bil­ity. All our mea­sures a...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Will any Big Tech Company Start a Public Prediction Market by the end of July 2027
Will Jevons · Manifold Markets · 2d ago
August 2026 AI model releases
prismatic · Manifold Markets · 3d ago
Will any of OpenAI’s “Ten Advances in Math and Theoretical CS” be shown to be flawed by the end of August?
Sketchy · Manifold Markets · 3d ago
AI safety prizes by OscarD🔸
OscarD🔸 · Nuno Sempere · 3d ago
Is a pause enforceable? New paper out! by Otto
Otto · Nuno Sempere · 5d ago