Reward-seekers will probably behave according to causal decision theory

·Redwood Research··

Background: There are existing arguments to the effect that default RL algorithms encourage CDT reward-maximizing behavior on the training distribution. (That is: Most RL algorithms search for policies by selecting for actions that cause high reward. E.g., in the twin prisoner’s dilemma, RL algorithms randomize actions conditional on the policy, which means that the action provides no evidence to the RL algorithm about the counterparty’s action.1) This doesn’t imply RL produces CDT reward-maximi...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Loss of Oversight: How AI Systems May Become Harder to Audit, Monitor, and Investigate
Jordan Taylor · LessWrong · 37m ago
The Case for Evaluating Model Behaviors
jsteinhardt · Alignment Forum · 20h ago
Mechanistic estimation for expectations of random products
Jacob Hilton · ARC · 5d ago
Multipolar Civilisation Depends on Maintaining an Attacker’s Dilemma
Naci Cankaya · LessWrong · 14d ago
Using Base-LCM to Monitor LLMs
Éloïse Benito-Rodriguez · LessWrong · 14d ago