Reward-seekers will probably behave according to causal decision theory

·Redwood Research··

Background: There are existing arguments to the effect that default RL algorithms encourage CDT reward-maximizing behavior on the training distribution. (That is: Most RL algorithms search for policies by selecting for actions that cause high reward. E.g., in the twin prisoner’s dilemma, RL algorithms randomize actions conditional on the policy, which means that the action provides no evidence to the RL algorithm about the counterparty’s action.1) This doesn’t imply RL produces CDT reward-maximi...

Read full article →

Related Articles

MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 2mo ago
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Gender Discrimination Transformed Rather Than
sbulaev · Hacker News · 14d ago
Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
Alex Mallen · Alignment Forum · 8d ago
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
Lukas Finnveden · Redwood Research · 10d ago
Can parts of the HuggingFace incident be simulated?
Benedikt Droste · LessWrong · 16d ago