Should we benchmark conceptual capabilities using judgment prediction tasks?

·Alignment Forum··

A bunch of conceptual reasoning tasks involve very subjective judgments, which makes them poorly suited for benchmarking AI capabilities. For example, it seems unreasonable to benchmark how well AIs can predict the probability of misaligned AI takeover. Perhaps instead we should measure capabilities by explicitly instructing the AI to predict a specified person’s judgment on this kind of question.(This quick document is aimed at people interested in benchmarking beneficial, urgent, and neglected...

Read full article →

Related Articles

How could the US and China verifiably slow AI?
josefely · LessWrong · 36m ago
Red-Teaming OpenAI's Internal Agent Monitoring Systems
Buck Shlegeris · Redwood Research · 6h ago
Monitorability evaluations and policy proposals
evhub · Alignment Forum · 8h ago
MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 3mo ago
Neural nets are exceptionally vulnerable to goal self-hack
Stuart_Armstrong · Alignment Forum · 1d ago