The case for fine-grained tracking of compute for AI by Katherine Biewer

·Nuno Sempere··

TL;DRCur­rent ap­proaches to track­ing AI com­pute pri­mar­ily rely on a hand­ful of hard­ware prox­ies (like FLOP/​s and band­width) that pri­mar­ily track GPU progress. Th­ese met­rics are be­com­ing less use­ful for ac­cu­rately track­ing com­pute for AI be­cause they (1) mea­sure the­o­ret­i­cal ceilings rather than ac­tual perfor­mance, (2) as ar­chi­tec­tures di­ver­sify away from a GPU/​TPU-dom­i­nant paradigm, the met­rics are be­com­ing less com­pa­rable across differ­ent ar­chi­tec­tur...

Read full article →

Related Articles

What is recursive self-improvement, and what would it mean to ban it? by sarahhw
sarahhw · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination by Ben_N
Ben_N · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
Will a non-lab AI-only effort solve a Millennium Problem in 2026?
Bayesian · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
Will the U.S. use a nuclear weapon against Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain between November 4 and November 10, 2026?
Laurent27bis · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
How many people will attend EAG NYC 2026?
d · Manifold Markets · 1d ago