The case for fine-grained tracking of compute for AI by Katherine Biewer

·Nuno Sempere··

TL;DRCur­rent ap­proaches to track­ing AI com­pute pri­mar­ily rely on a hand­ful of hard­ware prox­ies (like FLOP/​s and band­width) that pri­mar­ily track GPU progress. Th­ese met­rics are be­com­ing less use­ful for ac­cu­rately track­ing com­pute for AI be­cause they (1) mea­sure the­o­ret­i­cal ceilings rather than ac­tual perfor­mance, (2) as ar­chi­tec­tures di­ver­sify away from a GPU/​TPU-dom­i­nant paradigm, the met­rics are be­com­ing less com­pa­rable across differ­ent ar­chi­tec­tur...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Landmark new METR report: Can AIs already start ‘rogue deployments’ inside AI companies? by 80000_Hours
80000_Hours · Nuno Sempere · 23h ago
Will the next full gemini model be frontier at coding?
Ian Shea · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
Will there be more than 100 cases of ebola in the US in 2026?
Joseph Caissie · Manifold Markets · 2d ago
Robots reliably do my laundry by?
Mochi · Manifold Markets · 2d ago
Will the next full gemini model be as good as opus 4.7 or gpt 5.5 at coding?
Ian Shea · Manifold Markets · 2d ago