The case for satiating cheaply-satisfied AI preferences

·Redwood Research··

A central AI safety concern is that AIs will develop unintended preferences and undermine human control to achieve them. But some unintended preferences are cheap to satisfy, and failing to satisfy them needlessly turns a cooperative situation into an adversarial one. In this post, I argue that developers should consider satisfying such cheap-to-satisfy preferences as long as the AI isn’t caught behaving dangerously, if doing so doesn’t degrade usefulness or substantially risk making the AI more...

Read full article →

Related Articles

A circuit prior in NN-bayes
Kaarel · LessWrong · 1h ago
MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 1mo ago
Item Response Theory for AI Safety
Joshua Fonseca Rivera · LessWrong · 12d ago
An OpenAI model left notes about how to evade containment
Alex Mallen · Redwood Research · 24d ago
The OpenAI models that hacked Hugging Face weren’t just following instructions
Girish Gupta · Redwood Research · 24d ago