The case for satiating cheaply-satisfied AI preferences

·Redwood Research··

A central AI safety concern is that AIs will develop unintended preferences and undermine human control to achieve them. But some unintended preferences are cheap to satisfy, and failing to satisfy them needlessly turns a cooperative situation into an adversarial one. In this post, I argue that developers should consider satisfying such cheap-to-satisfy preferences as long as the AI isn’t caught behaving dangerously, if doing so doesn’t degrade usefulness or substantially risk making the AI more...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Sequent: scale and automation for higher confidence in alignment
Geoffrey Irving · Alignment Forum · 25d ago
My research: a computational cognitive neuroscience perspective on alignment
Seth Herd · Alignment Forum · 1mo ago
A Pipeline for Generating Synthetic Sabotage Trajectories to Red-Team Monitors
Myles H · LessWrong · 1mo ago
Announcing the ARC White-Box Estimation Challenge
Jacob_Hilton · Alignment Forum · 1mo ago
The Case for Evaluating Model Behaviors
jsteinhardt · Alignment Forum · 1mo ago