Toward a Better Evaluations Ecosystem

·LessWrong··

Model evaluations are broken. Numbers that are often cited alongside one another as evidence of progress are rarely comparable due to inconsistent methodologies, and AI companies run and report internal evals that are unavailable to the wider community. But we can fix this.We are making deployment and safety decisions based on numbers that do not mean what people think they mean. Every other high-stakes industry has solved this the same way, by taking the measurements out of the hands of the com...

Read full article →

Related Articles

MIT's New Method Flags AI Models Trained on CASM Without Generating It
sdoering · Hacker News · 2mo ago
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Gender Discrimination Transformed Rather Than
sbulaev · Hacker News · 14d ago
Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
Alex Mallen · Alignment Forum · 8d ago
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
Lukas Finnveden · Redwood Research · 10d ago
Can parts of the HuggingFace incident be simulated?
Benedikt Droste · LessWrong · 16d ago