We need more empirical research on biological AI model safety by Noga Aharony

·Nuno Sempere··

Epistemic sta­tus: We are quite con­fi­dent that Biolog­i­cal AI mod­els (BAIMs) safety re­quires fur­ther work, but un­cer­tain about its scale. The ap­par­ent gap may be re­futed by one ex­per­i­ment, filled by a few re­searchers work­ing for a year, or prove to be sub­stan­tial enough to call for an en­tire sub­field.Dis­claimer: this post has been writ­ten with a col­league, that due to her cur­rent job can’t post out of her own fo­rum accountWhat we’re look­ing for: please poke holes in thi...

Read full article →

Related Articles

Live models & dashboards of anticipated ~AI-wealth going to ~EA by The Unjournal (bot)
The Unjournal (bot) · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
Will any of Levent Alpöge’s mathematical results with Claude be proven flawed by the end of the year?
Sketchy · Manifold Markets · 1d ago
Will Levent's proof that S^6 admits a complex structure hold up?
Ziddletwix · Manifold Markets · 2d ago
Could an AI’s secret loyalty change? by Shu-Hao Liu
Shu-Hao Liu · Nuno Sempere · 3d ago
📈 Will Nvidia report Q2 FY2027 revenue above $92 billion?
Christos · Manifold Markets · 3d ago