The legibility trap: how “fund the most rigorous thinkers” can quietly select for the wrong people by Justin Steele

·Nuno Sempere··

Dis­clo­sure: I wrote this with help from an LLM as a draft­ing and edit­ing part­ner. The ar­gu­ment, the ex­pe­rience, the fac­tual claims, and ev­ery ed­i­to­rial de­ci­sion are mine; I di­rected the draft­ing, ver­ified the sources, and re­vised heav­ily. But enough of the fi­nal word­ing origi­nated in that col­lab­o­ra­tion that it likely crosses the 10% thresh­old, so I’m flag­ging it.Cross-posted and adapted from a piece I wrote for a gen­eral au­di­ence. I’ve rewrit­ten it for this com­...

Read full article →

Related Articles

What Effective AI Capability Investment Looks Like in Low Resource Research Settings by Alejandra Carriero
Alejandra Carriero · Nuno Sempere · 6h ago
Thoughts on Taking OpenAI Foundation Funding by Jeff Kaufman 🔸
Jeff Kaufman 🔸 · Nuno Sempere · 13h ago
What do AI assistants tell users about tobacco harm reduction? by Kristof Redei
Kristof Redei · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
Nearly 8 Billion Male Chicks Culled Per Year: A Transparent Global Estimate (Faunalytics) by JLRiedi
JLRiedi · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago
34% of the US public is now aware of AI xrisk, and the curve is steepening by Otto
Otto · Nuno Sempere · 1d ago